Home > ARTIKEL > Cultural significance determination as preliminary analysis in preserving urban historical area (Case study on municipality of Blitar, Indonesia)

Cultural significance determination as preliminary analysis in preserving urban historical area (Case study on municipality of Blitar, Indonesia)

ABSTRACT: – History is a cultural richness because through history, a nation has strong foundation in future development. Blitar is one of the Indonesia city that has history richness. In the past, this city linked directly with Indonesian independence movements as the home town of Indonesian Independence Proclaimer and as place of PETA rebellions. It is important that the historical value becomes consideration in determining appropriate preservation action for plan further development strategies on an historical area. This research uses 36 objects in form of building complexes and sculptures. Analysis techniques utilized in this research are factor analysis, multi-criteria evaluation, cluster analysis and t-test. Preliminary variables utilized in this research are cultural significance parameters called theoretical variables. These theoretical variables then were extracted using factor analysis in to 3 factors. The results of this research are the cultural signification level of every object and clustering of objects that form 6 cluster based on their cultural signification attributes. As the result using t-test, it was proved that development of clusters has relationship with cultural significance level of each objects, so the model proposed by cluster analysis then can be utilized to explain pattern of cultural significance attributes of each objects.
Keywords: – Cluster, Factor, Preservation, Urban History

REFERENCES
[1] Taufik, et al, History of Blitar (Government of Blitar Municipality, 2008).

[2] Martokusumo, Urban heritage conservation in Indonesia, Proc in The Indonesian city revisited, Institute of Social and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden,The Netherlands, 6-8 December, 2000.

[3] Martokusumo, Conservation of urban environment (ITB Press, Bandung. 2005)

[4] ICOMOS. The burra charter (Australia ICOMOS incorporated 2000, ISBN 0957852800, 1999)

[5] Indonesian network for heritage conservation and ICOMOS Indonesia, Indonesia charter for heritage conservation (Center for heritage conservation, department of architecture and planning, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2003)

[6] Siregar, et al. 2010, Cultural significance factors determination of indonesian independence historical area in Blitar city, Proc national seminar of magister and doctoral program, engineering faculty, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia, 2010.

[7] Al-hagla, Sustainable urban development in historical areas using the tourist trail approach, Elsevier Cities Journal 27 (2010), 234–248.

[8] Ruiters and Sanders, Physical planning: policies, methods and techniques (Faculty of civil engineering, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1998)

[9] Afandi, Antariksa and Hariyani, Preservation of PETA headquarter in Blitar city, Graduate theses, University of Brawijaya, 2008

[10] Adeniran and Akinlabi, Perceptions on cultural significance and heritage conservation: a case study of Sussan Wenger’s building, Osogbo, Nigeria, African Journal of History and Culture Vol. 3(5), pp. 73-88, June 2011

[11] Avrami, Mason and Torre, Value and heritage consevation, research report., The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 2009

Makalah ini telah dipublikasi secara internasional dalam IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN)
ISSN: 2250-3021 Volume 2, Issue 8 (August 2012), PP 16-22, dan dapat diakses dengan klik link atau copy-paste link di bawah ini ke browser.

http://www.iosrjen.org/pages/volume2-issue8(part-1).html


For more informations, please visit : http://ubrawijaya.academia.edu/JohannesParlindungan

CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION AS PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

Categories: ARTIKEL Tags:
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.
CAPTCHA Image
*